Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javi Herrera


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:11, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Javi Herrera

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Doesn't meet WP:GNG as laid out by WP:NSPORTS. He's a career minor league player who hasn't done anything notable. He hasn't been active this year according to Baseball Reference. Also, this article is almost an orphan, supporting my view that it's not worthy of entry, or else there would be more connections. Muboshgu (talk) 04:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC) No comments after a week? --Muboshgu (talk) 16:52, 26 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions.  —Muboshgu (talk) 04:45, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment - The sports notability bar is really low. As of today, this is a career minor leaguer and fails to clear notability. If he gets called up in August and plays one game, he's magically notable per se, at least as I understand the situation. The dividing line strikes me as silly. Carrite (talk) 19:01, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * It's long, long standing consensus that all Major League Baseball players satisfy notability guidelines. One "it's silly" opinion is not going to change how things are. That said, I don't see this player passing WP:GNG, so Delete. Vodello (talk) 21:30, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Looking at the numbers on the Baseball Reference page, looks like there will be no August call up. Carrite (talk) 19:03, 27 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment. Absent a showing of RS coverage (which can be here -- it need not be in the article), I am leaning towards delete.--Epeefleche (talk) 03:59, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.