Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javier Pinto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Javier Pinto

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

fails WP:GNG B-Factor (talk) 08:40, 17 February 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: This is a very newly created article. If this is deleted as a Soft Deletion, it will be restored quickly. So, let's try relisting it for a few more comments. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors,  and Bands and musicians. B-Factor (talk) 08:40, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - The article is from a single-purpose account and was probably written by self or supporter for promotional purposes. Under WP:NMUSICIAN his homemade music hobby is nowhere close to notable. Under WP:NAUTHOR he does not meet the requirements for "well-known work" or "significant critical attention", because beyond basic retail and promotional listings his books have not received any pro reviews or commentary that I can find. Also note that there are several other people of the same name. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 13:51, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. I wasn't able to find anything to establish notability for Pinto or really any coverage at all of him or his works. I found some general primary source hits and some junk hits, but nothing that would actually be usable for notability purposes. This seems to be your run-of-the-mill self-publishing creative who has not gained any mainstream attention. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  17:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.