Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaws: Rising


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 21:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Jaws: Rising

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreliable sources, crystal balling. Probable hoax. Was nominated for speedy, but listing here for second opinion. Will support speedy. The JPS talk to me  07:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC) •
 * Delete - was nominator for speedy, as was for Jaws V. Creator didn't fight the speedy deletion, instead just created this page. Sources are not reliable, and even their info says "maybe it will". Nothing definitive.  BIGNOLE    (Question?)  (What I do)  11:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film and TV-related deletions.   --  The JPS talk to me  12:00, 13 February 2007 (UTC) "
 * Delete. Speculation with no sources which can be called reliable at all. Fails WP:V. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - It just needs some rewriting. It's basically been speculated on ONE reliable site (Rotten Tomatoes).--  IAMTH EEGG  MAN  Δ dar  k s  ide 01:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment
 * Speculated to be made, even on a reliable source, does not constitute "made". Crystal balling isn't superceded by reliable sourcing. It's a straight to TV movie, or DVD (or whatever), on something that has yet to be. Fits the crystal balling policy, and lacks notability.  BIGNOLE    (Question?)  (What I do)  02:10, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom; Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. If actual production news arises, then article can be recreated.  In the meantime, there's no guarantee that production will take off.  Projects often spend many years on the shelf before they actually enter active production. —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 23:28, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.