Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay A. Tilden


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Jay A. Tilden

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 22:06, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United States of America. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:02, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Civil servant in the nuclear field. No extensive sourcing found. Trivial mentions. Oaktree b (talk) 22:21, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete While this person seems to have an interesting and important mid-level government job, that does not by itself signify notability. The sources cited are written by the subject or his organization, and few relevant WP:RS mentions or noteworthy news coverage. Despite the prior lengthy discussion, this one looks like an easy call to delete. Go4thProsper (talk) 08:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per Go4thProsper. Best, GPL93 (talk) 13:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:54, 19 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.