Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay E. Adams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The books about him make notability clear. JohnCD (talk) 19:41, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Jay E. Adams

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Effectively unreferenced BLP that I had trouble finding any independent sources for. Prodded as promotional with self-interested sources, prod was seconded, and then was contested. Gigs (talk) 03:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, on this one. Noble idea, interesting idea, certainly innovative.  But unfortunately, he's not really notable.  -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 06:16, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Not that this is particularly relevant to your vote, but in what way is advocating discrimination against nonchristians innovative? —David Eppstein (talk) 04:55, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Endorse prod, er, I mean delete due to lack of non-trivial coverage from reliable third parties.  JBsupreme  ( talk ) 20:59, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep worldcat lists 20 separate books about him, as well as 23 theses    How anyone can then say there are no sources for notability escapes me entirely. (I will say I am a little surprised; although I did not expect to find anything, and certainly not this much,   I looked anyway)   DGG ( talk ) 00:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * keep per DGG. JoshuaZ (talk) 03:32, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. He's one of the key writers in the field. I'll see if I can add some references. StAnselm (talk) 00:42, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Per DGG. Warrah (talk) 04:39, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've added quotations from Derek Tidball and John F. MacArthur to the article in order to establish notability. StAnselm (talk) 04:42, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.