Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Haizlip


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Withdrawn with no outstanding calls for deletion. WP:NAC. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:39, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Jay Haizlip

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As tag already notes, article is in promotional tone. The major issue is that the three references listed have no information regarding the subject, which leads the article to be original research. – Recollected &#8226;   04:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Promotional tone isn't grounds for deletion. WP:Deletion is not cleanup. Yes, the article needs better sources. Yes, it could stand to be written better. That doesn't warrant deletion. The subject is notable and that is the true standard. This in depth article alone passes GNG. These just add to it:, , , , Niteshift36 (talk) 04:52, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: If an admin could remove/close my listing, that would be great. Cleaned it up myself. No need to delete now. – Recollected &#8226;   05:14, 15 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.