Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Kellner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Elgin Children's Chorus. A merger can be performed by accessing the history of the redirected article. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 02:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Jay Kellner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails any applicable notability guideline. John from Idegon (talk) 00:10, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as none of this satisfies the applicable music notability. SwisterTwister   talk  02:34, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Elgin Children's Chorus. He only seems to be mentioned in relation to the chorus. --Michig (talk) 08:16, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:52, 30 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. North America1000 05:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Or Redirect I agree with nom, swistertwister, and michtig, he doesn't pass the notability requirements. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 12:54, 9 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to Elgin Children's Chorus. Source searches are not providing enough coverage to qualify a standalone article. North America1000 02:24, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * As nom, I would not oppose the redirect. Perhaps this can now be closed. John from Idegon (talk) 02:30, 16 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.