Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Losk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:40, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Jay Losk

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Propose deletion: Unsourced article for person with no ghits and no reference to him in either of the External Links provided. Original editor removed, with no explanation, an earlier speedy deletion nomination. Another editor suspects it to be a hoax. No dates given for person or his invention, so cannot know whether it should be a Prod blp! PamD (talk) 17:01, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can't find a mention of him anywhere and article cites nothing to support what it says.  Apart from that, I would question that there is a credible claim for notability.  Being an 'inventor' doesn't make you notable.  I've nothing to confirm my suspicion it is a hoax, except I'm puzzled how you can 'discover' a cleaning liquid formula.  -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 22:34, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I can find no mention of him not derived from Wikipedia except for possibly one page which causes my web browser to crash whenever I try to access it . Certainly no evidence of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:11, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Update I have now managed to look at the troublesome page I mentioned. Its mention of Jay Losk is, in fact, a link to Wikipedia, so that leaves no non-Wikipedia derived mention of him at all. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:36, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.