Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Reise


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:42, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Jay Reise

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

University based composer without great distinction. Should even be article? Recommended for deletion due to notability issues. Nomination recreated from edit summaries. ➨ REDVEЯS is always ready to dynamically make tea 11:40, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   —David Eppstein (talk) 17:40, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Google news finds several articles in the Philly Inquirer and NY Times about his operas. This web site also lists reviews in the Washington Times and London Evening Standard. That's enough for me. It seems like a clear pass of WP:MUSIC #1. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:50, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Satisfies WP:MUSIC, per David Eppstein's comments. Nsk92 (talk) 21:20, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Besides the criterion for Music, he holds a named chair in composition at the Univ. of Penn. DGG (talk) 00:45, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep passes both the Music and Prof guidelines by awards, reviews, and named chair at major school for composition. Exactly the type of person people expect to find unbiased WP information about.  -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 01:42, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Notability demonstrated through inclusion in reliable news sites and print sources. GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:25, 3 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.