Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Zuckerman2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:24, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Jay Zuckerman
While, this has been AfD'd before; looking at the google results for "Jay Zuckerman" sports; I can hardly find a mention of him. He may be the Jay Zuckerman mentioned as the author of a (highly non-notable) article, but that's only on the 2nd page, after about 10 or 15 other people doing a vast variety of different things. Unless a clear reference for this person can be found this should be deleted. And even if such a ref is found, importance still needs to be shown. JesseW, the juggling janitor 05:31, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

From the actual Jay himself: JesseW and other Wikipedians, please remove the page. I've been trying to get it off here for some time now. I have no idea why it was voted on as "keep," despite my message I placed in both Editing Talk and the Vote itself saying to please remove it. Once I found out it's been up there around August, I've tried to monitor it and manipulate it from a couple of vandals (esp. one in regards to an untrue pejorative statement about leaving Texas Christian University. I am by no means a notable person and once guested locally (NOT NATIONALLY) on an NPR affiliate, not NPR itself. Thanks for bringing this to light and your consideration. I brought it to attention by asking for a speedy deletion just yesterday and it was immediately reverted by an admin to the previous update. I hope that you all will speedily remove the Wikipedia entry. JZ
 * Delete unless any other reasons are found to keep it.--み使い Mitsukai 20:11, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable, but note that a notable subject would not have standing to request deletion of an article about them. A drian L amo ··  22:55, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Adrian, and agree what Adrian said that you don't own articles and don't have a right not to be written about if you don't want to. Stifle 18:35, 8 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.