Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay hops


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was:Speedily deleted as nonsense. Supposedly a definition of a slang term, but "it is an uncomenly used name". - Mike Rosoft 07:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Jay hops
Semi nonsensical Bio piece, no context, poorly written, fails G7, A1, A3, and A7 - note the name of the creator is also the name of the page SkierRMH 06:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, dicdef combined with a self-admitted vanity article. J I P  | Talk 06:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. definition, non-notable neologism, and borderline nonsense. Probably could have been prodded. Simões ( talk/contribs ) 06:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination and above comments; from the start it seems like there is just no way to get anything remotely verifiable and it's definitely vanity. — K e  akealani  07:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete article author himself asserts non-notability. Danny Lilithborne 07:14, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - CSD A7 as it seems to be primarily about the person. So tagged. MER-C 07:34, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * As a note, the article was originally tagged as a speedy, moved to prod after the speedy was rejected, and then the prod was rejected so a full AfD was required. I highly doubt that the speedy will be honoured now more than it was when the article was first written. — K  e  akealani  07:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.