Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay razon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  06:34, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Jay razon

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I have concerns over the notability of the subject. Besides a primary source, it relies heavily only on one other source. Airplaneman  ✈  23:50, 22 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - The article has been edited since the nomination, remocing some of the references that were of concern noted in the nomination. The coverage int eh Philipine News Today articles listed in this version don't focus on the subject.  I'm not finding any other coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 15:57, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

I think that the subject is notable for it has a back-up of articles cited in very pretigious Filipino newspaper —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimmy318 (talk • contribs) 00:11, 24 April 2010 (UTC)  — Kimmy318 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete The main claim to notability seems to me to be the sports centre, which is still in the fund-raising and planning stages. WP:CRYSTAL applies to that. The newspaper reports don't seem to indicate any great note - the first one focussing on the security measures against possible fraud in the fund-raising. Peridon (talk) 17:54, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The sources seem, at best, weak. A forum post, some press releases, and news articles from a news source that is both limited in scope and whose stories contain large numbers of errors. Problems with the sources aside, I don't see how Mr. Razon is notable. Lots of people raise funds for lots of good causes. No significant coverage from reliable sources. No actual argument for notability. Also: Some CoI seems to be cropping up in both the article and the AfD. » scoops  “  ŧäłķ  „ 00:39, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.