Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaya One


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃  (ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 12:30, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Jaya One

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is purely directory information. The place for it is on their web site, where anyone would naturally look.  DGG ( talk ) 06:34, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls and Malaysia.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Articles like this and this establish notability. NemesisAT (talk) 11:23, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

What sort of information could make the page keep-worthy then? Many other shopping mall articles are also as you call "directories", reviews on those might be needed then. KtMystic (talk) 16:14, 25 February 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ab207 (talk) 09:13, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:31, 8 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  02:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * To KtMystic, to make a page keep-worthy in Wikipedia, it needs to have many coverage in secondary sources. Any information taken from its official website or its own social media (e.g. Facebook, Instagram, Twitter etc) is not counted towards notability (per WP:GNG). It needs to be well-written in those secondary sources, not only a simple mention, and it needs to be from multiple sources (per WP:GNG). Secondary sources is like online newspaper (e.g. The Star, Berita Harian, Malaysiakini etc). Any language of those secondary sources is acceptable (including non-English), as long as you translate the cited title into English if they are not in English per (per WP:GNG). Chongkian (talk) 06:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - almost all of the sources used are primary sources (the mall's website), which can't establish any form of notability. XtraJovial (talk) 18:22, 18 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.