Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayla Rubinelli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 23:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Jayla Rubinelli


Non-notable losing game show contestant from America's Top Model, was prodded by User:Mikeblas, however, article survived an earlier mass AfD, Articles for deletion/Caridee English, which technically means it must be listed here, rather than prodded (I think). The conclusion of the previous AfD was "train wreck" -- essentially, too many articles nominated at once. However, since then, many of the articles have been deleted individually, including Kari Schmidt, Bre Scullark, Catie Anderson, Sarah Dankleman and many more. Others have been converted to redirects, such as Tiffany Richardson. (But the majority have simply been deleted.) Might be speediable under A7. Otherwise, should be merged or deleted as per ample precedent. Xtifr tälk 12:13, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - There is no content of value in the article. If anything, perhaps a list of contestants on the shows page or something but definitley not an entire article for a 2 lines summary.  Chris Kreider 12:19, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The articles on individual seasons of the show do list all the contestants for that season. Xtifr tälk 12:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - non-notable reality TV reject. MER-C 12:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I was the original prodder. (Sorry; I'm not familiar with the rule about previous AfDs, and even if I was, Jayla's discussion page doesn't mention the previous AfD attempt; and I don't know what the "train wreck" AfD resolution actually means or implies for future deletion consideration.) -- Mikeblas 15:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you should always check the history before prodding, although if you overlook a previous AfD or prod, it's no big deal, as, in the worst case, the admin will probably just go ahead and convert the prod to a new AfD. I just thought I'd try to save time.  As for "train wreck", that was just the closing admin's wry assessment of a discussion where people were listing individual articles as keep or delete, and there was no way to pick-and-choose a clear consensus out of the mess.  The important part is that he said, "This closure is not a judgement for or against any one article, please re-list seperately where appropriate."  Which is what we're doing now.  Xtifr tälk 23:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, or redirect to ANTM5 per other case precedents. Ohconfucius 04:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, reality contestants are inherently notable and meet WP:BIO. --badlydrawnjeff talk 16:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * WP:BIO says nothing of the sort, and your "argument" has already been shown to be based on a falsehood here. wikipediatrix 17:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Per WP:BIO: "television personalities who have appeared in well-known films or television productions." Reality contestants meet the little line items if you need them for further reference.  Please cease with the incivil accusations. --badlydrawnjeff talk 17:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable tv personality JBKramer 18:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.