Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayna Oso


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:38, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Jayna Oso

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:PORNBIO with merely nominations. An internet search revealed nothing which would indicate she passes WP:GNG Finnegas (talk) 21:21, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator's accurate analysis. No claim to passing PORNBIO; no independent, reliable sourcing. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:10, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  ///Euro Car  GT  23:34, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:15, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 16 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails PORNBIO without award wins. Fails GNG. Significant reliable source coverage not cited in the article nor found in search. • Gene93k (talk) 03:36, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - encyclopedic porn star. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   16:48, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Please can you explain what policy you are basing the argument that this is a notable pornstar. Its certainly not PORNBIO. Spartaz Humbug! 06:50, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails PORNBIO without award wins. Hipocrite (talk) 20:07, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete BLPs require substantially better sourcing then this. Spartaz Humbug! 06:50, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete poor sourcing, no awards that meet requirements, is not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.