Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jazmine Cashmere


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:36, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Jazmine Cashmere

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: as non-notable pornographic actress. Quis separabit? 21:12, 20 August 2015 (UTC)  Quis separabit?  21:12, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 20 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz's PROD rationale was correct: " Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No qualifying awards. Negligible reliably sourced biographical content. " An Urban X award win is not enough to pass PORNBIO. Searches for significant RS coverage come up empty. • Gene93k (talk) 21:59, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. I disagree with Gene93k. Although the article certainly needs to be improved, it is legitimate. She won an individual award and in my opinion the Urban X satisfies the WP:PORNBIO requirement. -- fdewaele, 21 August 2015, 11:20 CET.
 * Keep - winner of the Urban X Award, meets of WP:PORNBIO/Wikipedia:Notability (people). Subtropical -man  talk   (en-2)   11:29, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as Urban X is not a notable award, thus failing pornbio & gng. Tarc (talk) 15:15, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per the well-established consensus that the Urban X/Spice awards fail the "well-known"/"significant" standard, as demonstrated in prior discussions like Articles for deletion/Kitten (pornographic actress), Articles for deletion/Aurora Jolie, Articles for deletion/Devlin Weed, Deletion_review/Log/2011_January_24, Articles_for_deletion/Cherokee_D%27Ass_%283rd_nomination%29, Articles_for_deletion/Kaiya_Lynn, Articles for deletion/Ray Victory (2nd nomination), and Articles for deletion/Kirra Lynne.
 * , a primary reason this short-lived and already defunct award fails the standard is that, as I originally wrote elsewhere, The Urban X ceremony is a coatrack of an event, meant mostly as an excuse to sell tickets to an event to "civilians," not a bona fide honor. It is neither well-known, nor significant. nor an industry award. It is certainly not "well-known"; the article on the award itself has no independent, reliable sourcing, and neither GNews nor GBooks searching turns up any substantive coverage. It is not an industry award; it is not sponsored by any industry group or organization. Instead, it is a personal moneymaking project of one Giana Taylor, a non-notable Suze Randall model and one-time Playboy Cyber Girl. Its lack of significance can be measured not only the constantly shifting of awards categories, reflecting the promotional needs of each year's ceremony's paying sponsors, not only by the fact that award categories were up for sale, so that paying sponsors could be assured of awards categories that only their productions were eligible for, not only by the fact that the awards were (said to be) based on a website poll where anyone could vote an unlimited number of times, but by the fact that in the award's five years of existence, a whopping 36 awards have gone to one Alexander Devoe, the husband of award founder Giana Taylor and his production company, with at least another dozen going to Taylor's producing partner, Brian Pumper. This award is barely more significant than Pathmark's "Cheese of the Month", or McDonald's naming the Big Mac "Hamburger of the Year". The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 16:40, 21 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment - Whatever one thinks of the Urban X Awards, the "Best Anal Performer" Award is not a "significant industry award" category at all. Not all the specific awards that the various adult film industry award ceremonies give out are considered to be major awards. Guy1890 (talk) 21:05, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Hullaballoo Wolfowitz's thorough reasoning above. Finnegas (talk) 15:13, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per above - Fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 04:56, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above. Solution is to find GNG worthy sources, not to twist every routine or marginal award to retain inadequately sourced BLPs. Spartaz Humbug! 18:05, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above, non notable award. Myname is not dave (talk/contribs) 17:15, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete fails PORNBIO, the award is an already defunct in-trade hand-out (as to "well known", I've never heard about it before), no indication of notability Kraxler (talk) 00:19, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO and WP:GNG. Steel1943  (talk) 01:41, 28 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.