Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jazz Tour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep (No Consensus) Cheers.  I 'mperator 23:17, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Jazz Tour

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable tour. Article consists only of a setlist and list of dates. Fails WP:NOTINHERITED Rwiggum  (Talk /Contrib ) 14:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  19:17, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Tour generated substantial press coverage at the time, and should be able to meet the general notability guideline with ease if one looks in a suitable place (i.e., contemporary newspapers and music magazines). JulesH (talk) 20:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Could you please provide some of that coverage? And to be notable, the tour must be notable on its OWN, completely regardless of what band it was for, because notability cannot be inherited from another subject. The subject of the article must be notable in its own right, and nothing seems to suggest that here. Rwiggum  (Talk /Contrib ) 21:01, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, a non-notable tour that fails to satisfy the general notability guideline with significant coverage in reliable, third-party, sources. Just an indiscriminate collection of fancruft.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 00:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: trivial coverage, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 02:27, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: nothing inherently notable about this tour, a list of dates without explanation or rationale. A-Kartoffel (talk) 03:11, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - lots of non-trivial press coverage which is not available on the net or is hard to find due to the title (both, "jazz" and "queen" are not the best search terms), but it is reflected in the standard secondary literature. -- Avant-garde a clue - hexa Chord 2  22:47, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Tour was reviewed in The Washington Post, and it was memorable enough that Rolling Stone had something to say about it even two years later. And I have no reason to doubt JulesH that even more press coverage exists from 1978 and 1979, but thanks to FUTON bias (as well as only being able to use generic words and phrases for search terms, as hexaChord points out) it probably won't be found in a Google search. DHowell (talk) 01:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - the first link is not bad, as it brings up which provides reviews for a lot of other concerts. -- Avant-garde a clue - hexa  Chord 2  01:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I found another full review in the Los Angeles Times. DHowell (talk) 02:46, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.