Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jazz anderson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 03:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Jazz anderson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BASIC  Nott Nott  talk &#124;contrib 14:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * It was hard to find any extra sources other than those already sourced in the article: , and yes, they're not looking too good.  Nott Nott   talk &#124;contrib 16:06, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: I suspect Googlebombing. Moreover being the daughter of a popular person doesn't make you "popular". --—OluwaCurtis »» (talk to me) 15:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment The person most interested in defending this article doesn't understand how to do this because I believe they are (somewhat) attempting to do that on their talk page. But they will probably just end up leaving wikipedia. -- MurderByDeadcopy  "bang!"  16:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I've attempted to help the user understand this on his/her talk page, but you're totally right - this isn't the best way to introduce someone to editing.  Nott Nott  talk &#124;contrib 16:41, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * It has got to be the worst welcome to Wikipedia ever. The talk page hadn't even been patrolled yet. No matter what I think about this article doing this comes across as callous. (Unless, of course, there's a blatant issue with an article!) Seems like one should check to see who started the article and at least welcome them to wikipedia before nominating their article to AfD. -- MurderByDeadcopy  "bang!"  16:58, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Noted. My intention was never to scare away the editor - and while patrolling Huggle at a fast speed you can be prone to forget basic etiquette like that. I've taken steps that will hopefully rectify the situation, but this is a fault.  Nott Nott  talk &#124;contrib 17:10, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:BASIC and WP:GNG. Coverage looks to be at best tabloid mentions which I doubt are even WP:RS. J bh  Talk  16:36, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  16:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  16:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  16:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as there's simply nothing better. SwisterTwister   talk  07:07, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as it fails WP:GNG. I would suggest Userfy, but that would only encourage a new editor to work on an article which has very little chance of acceptance.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:24, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.