Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jazz performers at Black Hawk, 1962


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Userfy to User:Bob sleadd retired police/Jazz performers at Black Hawk, 1962. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:40, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Jazz performers at Black Hawk, 1962

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Confusing and WP:OR. Not sure if this is supposed to be about the author, some pictures, or actually something about the title. Can't really fit into any CSD for this article, although it is a possible WP:G2. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  23:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * ' Delete -Definitely WP:OR. Looks like the article's author might be communicating with Wikipedia in hopes of finding some information he wants, or is wanting to create an article about himself and his photos.  WP:G2 seems like a good category, now that the author is in touch with people who can give him some guidance.  ABF99 (talk) 00:36, 12 September 2016 (UTC) changing my ivote to Userfy' per Metropolitan90's comments below ABF99 (talk) 07:15, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think G2 would be perfectly acceptable, and even if the CSD criteria don't fit, I am hard-pressed to think of anyone who would want to keep this (I'm guessing a SNOW close here). Primefac (talk) 01:15, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Userfy. I suppose it's not the end of the world if they want to keep this somewhere in their userspace. Primefac (talk) 23:58, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Userfy. The writer of this page apparently wants to communicate with people who might have information about the subject, and perhaps his doing so could lead to the addition of information or photos to Wikipedia. This doesn't belong in the mainspace, and he admits that by saying, "I know this is not what is called an 'Article'". But having it on his userpage or a user subpage would probably serve his purposes, would do no harm, and could possibly result in benefit to Wikipedia. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:28, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Userfy. It would be a shame to destroy this information because it doesn't fit policy. Put it in user space. Andrew327 12:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:49, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:51, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:51, 12 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Userfy -- an unreferenced personal essay and WP:OR. Wikipedia is not a WP:WEBHOST for personal reminiscences. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as the AfD itself specifies how this, in no form or shape, actually states where it can be acceptable or improved to the levels of an actual article. The fact this was an SPA and the user actually signed it themselves (!!) states how it's quite unlikely they would come and improve it, let alone to the levels of acceptance, if they were not at least knowledgeable of basic uses and activities here at Wikipedia. Therefore, if the article itself contains such a journalesque form, there's nothing to keep, especially if it starts with "I had the special privilege to be allowed....". SwisterTwister   talk  02:33, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.