Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jazz videos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete anyways. TheProject 05:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Jazz videos
Appears to be spam, links only to one external site, is not a history of Jazz videos or anything Gnewf 00:32, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - pure adspam. - Richardcavell 00:35, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above--Jusjih 00:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Ads, unencyclopedic. Couldnt this be speedy? -- zero faults  undefined  00:55, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Adambiswanger1 01:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - spam. Skyraider 01:18, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as adspam Ted 01:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete spam. &mdash; Khoikhoi 02:21, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Should be speedied as advert. ---Charles 02:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete spam.-- Andeh 03:20, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Question: I did speedy this article with the reason "spam" but it got removed by Stifle and I got a note saying spam "is not currently one of our criteria for speedy deletion, so I have removed the speedy deletion tag". So, what's the protocol? Gnewf 04:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.