Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jd era


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete. Kimchi.sg 07:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Jd era, JD Era
fails WP:BIO, WP:NOR, and WP:MUSIC; probably written by the article's subject as a vanity article. hoopydink Conas tá tú? 00:39, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Repost of JD Era deleted due to A7. --NMChico24 00:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per NMChico. --Bill (who is cool!) 00:46, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect to JD Era. —Caesura(t) 04:37, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete JD Era per CSD-G4, speedy delete Jd era per CSD-G7 - the editor's blanked that article. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 04:48, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete JD Era, not notable enough. Mushroom (Talk) 05:26, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * DO NOT DELETE JD Era, there isnt anything wrong with this article. Toronto06 (Talk) 05:26, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The article is a repost of an article that was already deleted. This is automatic grounds for deletion. The reason for the previous deletion is the current lack of notability per Wikipedia notability guidelines for musicians. If the artist blows up, we'll certainly need an article on him, but right now he doesn't meet these guidelines, and it's too soon to predict that he will. Speedy Delete per WP:CSD. -- H·G (words/works) 06:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.