Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jdm64


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:14, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Jdm64

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has notability tag since September 2019. AfD'ing to either remove the tag or delete the article. Personally I think it should be Kept, as the subject has played in several notable CS:GO teams (Liquid and Envy), participating in several Majors and other notable tournaments, with the following sources:, , , , , , , , ,  ~Styyx   Talk? ^-^  15:50, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  ~Styyx   Talk? ^-^  15:58, 22 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete there is no meeting of any inclusion criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:56, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment There are a lot more CS:GO players that have Wikipedia articles. This subject certainly passes WP:SIGCOV with the sources above. ~Styyx   Talk? ^-^  14:23, 27 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete/Comment - This is not how you file an AfD. An AfD should be filed by a user that believes the subject should be deleted for not meeting notability or other reasons, not by somebody that thinks it should be kept. With the lackluster sourcing used, there is no way this would meet notability. Just because other articles exist doesn't mean consensus supports keeping those, please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Namcokid  47  (Contribs) 15:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.