Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Baptiste Loisel Le Gaucher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Jean-Baptiste Loisel Le Gaucher

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I declined a WP:PROD of this article thinking it could be salvaged. I was able to find some references to back up claims in the article, but the subject simply doesn't pass WP:NBIO. The only sources I can find are general lists of French noble families or genealogical records for this family, like this. This person is referenced in the article for Château du Broutel, which seems notable enough, but I don't think that confers notability to people connected to it. The family as a whole might be notable, as lords of Broutel, but I'll leave that determination up to someone who can actually read French. clpo13(talk) 15:55, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 15:56, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 15:56, 8 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Same as proponant, I could only find short mentions on genealogy websites and on google books. Comte0 (talk) 16:26, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge to Château du Broutel. Subject otherwise seems to fail WP:NBIO. Mentions in genealogies/lists of nobles are just passing mentions, and of course WP:INHERITED applies, especially given the lack of sufficient sourcing to satisfy WP:SIGCOV. 198.84.253.202 (talk) 20:03, 16 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.