Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-François Jamet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 10:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Jean-François Jamet

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable. A few interviews on TV and contributions to collective books are a staple for a schloar. Delated of fr: by speedy deletion. Bokken | 木刀 11:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 13:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO and WP:PROF, non-notable. Drawn Some (talk) 17:50, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Additionnal remark : the article has been restored and re-deleted on fr: following a request by Jean-François himself. I happen to know him and told him what was happening. It seems the article was made by a relative who misinterpreted the notability guildelines on fr. I wonder if it could be grounds for a speedy deletion here. Here his him asking for the deletion. He also requested the debate being blanked out in order to avoid referencing by search engines. Bokken | 木刀 19:15, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:40, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak DeleteAccording to the full CV at, only 6 actual papers in journals, none covered by WoS, but it does a really lousy job on European social science in non-english journals. Scopus should do better, but it's down. I'll check later. The significance of the Schuman policy papers is unclear. They are not in WoS. DGG (talk) 22:14, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Others have not found enough notabilty. Also, I give weight to the subject's wishes. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:31, 21 June 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete. Seems to be of extremely marginal notability per our guidelines, and given that the subject requested deletion on the French Wiki (I'm in favor of generally honoring requests from marginally notable figures to delete their BLPs) I think this should be deleted. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 06:54, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.