Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Pierre Eckmann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Baseball   Watcher  22:28, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Jean-Pierre Eckmann

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Published academic but does not appear to meet WP:ACADEMIC. Coverage in secondary sources is limited. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:27, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete pending eventual location of criteria meeting the guideline. I took a quick look in Google and found 362,000 results, but the earliest ones aren't very notable.  CycloneGU (talk) 23:35, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 27 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep. GS cites are 1732, 643, 373 with h index = 26. Please will the nominator explain why he did not reveal this information in his nomination? Xxanthippe (talk) 23:10, 29 April 2011 (UTC).
 * What information are you referencing? I'm afraid I don't follow this.  CycloneGU (talk) 23:34, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Click on the scholar link above. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:03, 30 April 2011 (UTC).


 * Strong keep. As well as the clear pass of WP:PROF demonstrated by Xxanthippe, he also passes #C3 by virtue of his membership in the Academia Europaea, which I've just added to the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:15, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep (replacing above opinion of mine) in light of this new information. CycloneGU (talk) 02:30, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Perhaps the nominator would like to withdraw so that the system is clogged up with one less AfD? Xxanthippe (talk) 02:59, 30 April 2011 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.