Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Pierre Grünfeld


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy (talk) 15:03, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Jean-Pierre Grünfeld

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reviewed as a part of new article curation / review process. No indication of wp:notability. No wp:gng suitable sources, No claims relevant to SNG. Article has been tagged for notability since December 2019 and creator has not edited since then or since their one edit which created the article in 2019. North8000 (talk) 13:25, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I also looked at this under new page review and couldn’t see how it was notable, but decided to leave it to someone else to bring it here. So thank you. Mccapra (talk) 15:35, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 18:33, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 18:33, 12 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:PROF. His works are highly cited . TJMSmith (talk) 19:46, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 19:46, 12 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. Has two elected academy memberships (French Academy of Sciences and Royal Academy of Medicine of Belgium. He is a correspondent rather than a full member for each of these, so I am not entirely sure if these academy memberships are sufficient for passing WP:PROF but they certainly count towards WP:PROF. Also has the French Legion of Honour. The CV at the French Academy of Sciences mentions a bunch of other stuff, including an honorary degree. Together with substantial citability, enough here to pass WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 18:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep With thanks to Nsk92. Mccapra (talk) 13:49, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per the arguments already made by TJMSmith and Nsk92. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:10, 17 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.