Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Emond


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. fulfils notability cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Jean Emond

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article fails WP:BIO. Article was created by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related to columbiasurgery.org. possible copyvio http://asp.cumc.columbia.edu/facdb/profile_list.asp?uni=je111&DepAffil=Surgery. Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article Hu12 (talk) 07:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources independent of the subject. DarkAudit (talk) 14:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.   —Espresso Addict (talk) 23:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Named professorship. Medline finds 119 articles for "JC Emond" which on a quick scan nearly all look to be him, including several high-profile reviews eg in Annu Rev Med & J Am Coll Surg. Google Scholar finds two papers with over 250 citations, a further three with >100, and many with >50. He meets my definition of WP:PROF. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   —Espresso Addict (talk) 02:36, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. More importantly he meets Wikipedia's definition of WP:PROF. In fact he passes every criterion, even though only one is required: Google news shows that he passes 1, the citations take care of 2-4, the liver transplant work gets him through 5 and the named professorship 6. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep there is some misunderstanding here about COI: it does not make the subject unnotable or the article subject to being deleted. Being based on a web page is not copyvio. copying it or directly paraphrasing it is copyvio, though it is true that a good deal of COI material from PR people is copyvio, so it is right to have checked it. Some of what this PR person entered is clearly acceptable here--like this. Notable both as a researcher and clinician. "Director of Transplantation NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY" -- this counts as head of the service at a major teaching hospital--subject to correction, it amounts to the same status as chairman of the dept at a corresponding medical school. Professor of Surgery and Pediatrics at Columbia, reflecting the research--and it is the recognition of the research which makes scholars notable. DGG (talk) 00:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.