Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Sini


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:38, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Jean Sini

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. This very promotional article only serves to promote the startups/companies he joined/co-founded to give them credibility from someone who is described with so much puffery in the lead section. w umbolo  ^^^  13:14, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 13:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 13:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 13:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 13:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOTLINKEDIN. Article is entirely made up of primary sources and is a resume more than anything. Nothing of value. – FenixFeather (talk) (Contribs) 20:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Edited article to include active role in startup community, notable investments, and public speaking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbaackle (talk • contribs) 03:39, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: I would note that you, Dbaackle, are one in a series of suspicious SPAs that have edited this article, always in a promotional manner. Should you really be voting here? Lovelylinda1980 (talk) 13:13, 13 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete The article was created by an SPA and is clearly promotional in character. The only coverage in reliable secondary sources basically just takes note of hirings and firings. That doesn't count towards notability. This article fails GNG and all relevant tests for biographies. It is also a horrible mess. Lovelylinda1980 (talk) 13:08, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - created as part of a promotional spam cluster in 2008, and not brought to clear notability in the intervening time. It's been this bad for ten years; no prospects of improvement - David Gerard (talk) 21:34, 14 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.