Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jed Brandt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Occupy Wall Street. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 14:57, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Jed Brandt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD removed without explanation. I am reversing my previous position on this BLP's notability.

The only barely notable item here is the OWSJ editorship, which can be merged into Occupied Wall Street Journal itself.

Most of the biographical information sourced is from the personal website of the subject - in the end, there is no sufficient third party coverage of the subject itself, but rather of peripheral events the subject has been involved with. Cerejota (talk) 08:17, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 28 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete while the journal may be notable, it is not notable enough to make its editor notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:54, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the Occupy Wall Street article. Non-notable person, but potential search term that should be redirected. Ducknish (talk) 21:29, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:AUTHOR and WP:BOOK. Qworty (talk) 05:41, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.