Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jed Ismael


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Jed Ismael

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Main claim to fame seems to the Instagram porn thing which was discovered by the subject. Coverage of this event don't seem to push him over WP:GNG and neither do any sources found by a Google search. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:53, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

trusted references such as the daily star are mentioned, with over 55 news website from around the globe mentioning the same issue and the same blogger. it has enough references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.204.90.183 (talk) 18:23, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Besides the Daily Star being a tabloid, if Ismael is only known for this one thing, the article should just redirect to Instagram. Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:14, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
 * That section of the Instagram page was added by the same user who created the disputed page in question. i.e. Special:Contributions/Lily9980 — Christopher.akiki (talk) 14:23, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

He's also known for hacking major Lebanese companies and banks live on tv, which were references by the corresponding articles written in arabic178.135.242.154 (talk) 05:33, 30 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - seems to be a case of WP:BLP1E, and there are further BLP concerns. Better he be mentioned in the Instagram article per Patar knight above. ✤ Fosse   8 ✤  10:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as there's still nothing for solid independent notability, nothing convincing this can be acceptable aside from the apparent event. SwisterTwister   talk  21:42, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, certainly a case of WP:BLP1E as mentioned by Fosse8. Not notable. Arun Kumar SINGH  (Talk)  11:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.