Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jed Rose


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. I'll note that I was not impressed with the 2 WP:ITSNOTABLE "keep" !votes and MQS's delete !vote is sound but the unevaluated source provided by SW provides just enough reasonable doubt about whether or not this article should be deleted. However, this is a BLP and multiple supersources are required so consider this a temporary reprieve. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Jed Rose

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )


 * Delete. Fails WP:ARTIST. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 02:07, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 13 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:07, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Keep. Notable and good article.  Should be expanded, however.  LogicalCreator (talk) 13:42, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Difficult to expand, as Rose is almost more sourcable for his day job working for Microsoft than he is for working and teaching improv. Improv performers do not often meet inclusion criteria, and this fellow looks to fail the criteria of both WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:11, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:20, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisting comment. Per this request on my talk page, I'm reopening this AFD so new sources can be considered. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:22, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep very good and notable article. Andrei.smolnikov (talk) 08:07, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -Scottywong | confabulate _ 17:25, 31 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisting comment: Looking for substantive comments on this source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/p00rknv5 (starting at 11m40s).  -Scottywong | confabulate _  17:26, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.