Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeddah Hilton Hotel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete under WP:G11. (non-admin closure) M assiveYR   ♠  05:17, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Jeddah Hilton Hotel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article seems to be here simply to promote the hotel and includes contributions from a paid editor, User:Valgetova. Leutha (talk) 16:19, 18 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment This article was created without the afd2 template and was never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now--I have no opinion on the nomination itself at this time.   For future nominations please fully follow the procedures as WP:AFDHOWTO.  Thanks.  -- Finngall   talk  17:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:06, 28 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Despite concerns about the nomination. The page was created by and 's contributions seem limited to a requested move from Jeddah Hilton to Jeddah Hilton Hotel and and EL to the hotel's website, hardly significant contributions by a paid editor.  That said, the page does not provide an evidence of complying with the general notability guideline and I can find only routine coverage about the hotel.  The subject appears to lack significant coverage in independent, reliable sources.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 03:57, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:41, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as unambiguous advertising; the article is 100% promotional. I'll request a G11 -- let's see if it takes. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:55, 11 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.