Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeevan TV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. I'm not sure the keep expression is particularly convincing, however with 3 relists and no further expressions, there is no consensus to delete. (non-admin closure) Bungle (talk • contribs) 17:31, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Jeevan TV

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unreferenced stub about non-notable TV channel. Search finds a couple of mentions from around the time of its launch (nearly 20 years ago), otherwise just social media, programme guides, etc. Fails WP:GNG / WP:NMEDIA. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:54, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:54, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:54, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:54, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:54, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: This is one of the first TV channels from Kerala as well as the first catholic TV channel in Kerala. I am putting some sources here even though I think it wont help.  . Pillechan   (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ)  18:20, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:46, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:34, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  07:08, 29 June 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Once more; some analysis of the presented sources would be appreciated.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:28, 6 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.