Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Clark (poet)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. Non-admin closure. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 23:07, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Jeff Clark (poet)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Presenting this article for review. This person doesn't seem notable enough to me. He only has a couple of works, and from what I've seen, works with non-notable entities in the field. ArcAngel (talk) 00:58, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - A visible young poet who should be in Wikipedia. Not quite sure what the nominator can mean by "non-notable entities."  The James Laughlin award?  Farrar Straus?  Sun and Moon Press?  I added a few small things.--Wageless (talk) 03:06, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Contains a decent source or two.  Needs to be written more objectively and better sourced.  Renee (talk) 03:39, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, plenty of reviews available. One I found calls him "one of our most significant younger poets". Jfire (talk) 03:47, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have to agree with Wageless here -- there was plenty of evidence of notability in theicle as nominated, including a major award and publication by a major press. Needs some cleanup/wikification and better references, of course. --Dhartung | Talk 05:49, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Subject has been the recipient of notable awards. Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 06:49, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.