Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Dye


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Last Comic Standing 6. Black Kite (t) (c) 01:30, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Jeff Dye

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Article was a redirect and recently changed back to an article by an SPA. The article still lacks enough sources to justify notability. I feel that it should be changed back to a redirect. Dismas |(talk) 00:10, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

*Keep The decision to delete a comedian smells bad when the subject page in question contains a beg for money message from Jimbo Wales. There is clearly way too much East Coast user/admin bias on these deletions. A television and radio broadcast is notible whether it be a long or short career. Actors and artistic performers should not be deleted by armchair critics who have no personal knowledge or have actually seen them perform. Rather than deletionism why not try to improve the content or reach out to the contributors by obtaining more information? PsychClone —Preceding undated comment added 22:10, 13 November 2010 (UTC). Trolling struck per ANI consensus. Favonian (talk) 21:34, 14 November 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Change back to redirect. The fact that someone changed it from a redirect to an article without consent is one factor for this. The second part is that 2/3 of the sources are gossip sites/magazines. Endofskull (talk) 00:22, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect the page and semi-protect it. I have a feeling if the page isn't protected, it'll be reverted back to the original article a few weeks after this AfD closes.--hkr (talk) 00:24, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:32, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:32, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - generally, we keep the win, place, show (1st, 2nd, 3rd) in major "reality" shows, and often because the winners go nowhere with their careers while the other top two finalists succeed further. In this case, he's the show.  He also has independently won other kudos (laffs?). Bearian (talk) 13:25, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Redirect and semiprotect No significant coverage. Ray  Talk 03:52, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Sufficient notability for a standalone article as evidenced by coverage like this . PicodeGato (talk) 01:39, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.