Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Fairhall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. &mdash; J I P | Talk 06:29, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Jeff Fairhall
Subject is not notable enough to merit an entry Lukobe 18:31, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * DELETE per nomination. Lukobe 18:31, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete· Original research and non-significant. A religious leader with no followers is just a lunatic. Average Earthman 21:23, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. 235 google hits for "Jeff Fairhall" suggests no significance. Article has been deleted before, but I don't know if it's essentially a recreation. Punkmorten 21:29, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable crackpot. MCB 22:24, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Abstain I know that there are a lot of people in Seattle who consider this man to be cutting-edge performance art if nothing else. I would have expected people who watch the Fremont page to appreciate that, but perhaps not.  The people who say that Fairhall does not have a following are just not into the kind of fun that people like Fairhall attract, and they are those who like their art sanctioned by the consensus of the "garbage collage in a museum" majority.  However, I wrote the article, and it is original research, so it does not fit wikipedia guidelines.  Delete it if you find it inappropriate, but do not come crying to me when EVERYTHING HE EVER SAID COMES TRUE.  Chiggieflip 17:19, 18 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.