Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Gilberthorpe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JForget 00:34, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Jeff Gilberthorpe

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

Removed CSD, procedural nom. Aditya Ex Machina 20:29, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - I'm not sure what the problem is. Article seems adequately sourced, subject seems notable enough. --MelanieN (talk) 21:40, 6 December 2009 (UTC)MelanieN
 * Comment. It would be useful to have a substantive reason for deletion from the nominator, so that we know what we are discussing. There is no procedure that compels anyone to nominate any article for deletion, so "procedural nom" is meaningless. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:27, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Why is this article nominated for deletion? It seems to fit the criteria and specifications. The subject is notable, the article is neutral and the artist was utterly unaware of the creation of the article and not involved in any way.(Qtmonky (talk) 14:33, 9 December 2009 (UTC)|talk]])


 * Keep - There is not rationale given for deletion. A Google News search provides results behind pay walls but the available summary information would indicate the artist is notable. -- Whpq (talk) 17:59, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep, there is no reason given for deletion so there can be nothing more to add to the debate. Mah favourite (talk) 01:18, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.