Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Gum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 20:13, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Jeff Gum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Absolutely nothing here since the career itself is entirely trivial and unconvincing and our non-negotiable policies are clear about this. SwisterTwister  talk  18:48, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, though charitably one might say this as WP:TOOSOON because he has secured potentially high profile parts in a couple of 2017 films. However, it's best to wait to see if they fly or bomb before Gum hangs his notability to their coat tails. His other roles seem to be fairly small, suggesting he is just a jobbing actor. Sionk (talk) 20:18, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Press releases are not reliable sources. There aren't any reliable sources that show the subject is worthy of its own article space. In addition, the article is only one sentence long. Scorpion293 (talk) 23:24, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per nom, above rationale, and overarching WP:GNG. GauchoDude (talk) 13:25, 10 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.