Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Hammerbacher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 20:35, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Jeff Hammerbacher

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject is not noteworthy, original page was created many years ago as fluff, very empty page after spam has been removed Nickgray (talk) 20:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Businesspeople,  and United States of America. Shellwood (talk) 21:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep There are at least two solid sources, the NY Times and Fast Company. The article is a bit sparse but the person meets GNG, IMO. Lamona (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. In addition to the sources provided by, Hammerbacher is given significant coverage in Automate This: How Algorithms Came to Rule Our World. The three sources that provide WP:SIGCOV are enough to meet WP:NBASIC/WP:GNG. —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:13, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per above meets WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep meets WP:GNG Bruxton (talk) 01:45, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Based on the sources already in the article, it seems as though this nom was misplaced. Bearian (talk) 14:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep meets SIGCOV per above.  // Timothy :: talk  13:03, 11 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.