Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Hammond (porn star)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  22:05, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Jeff Hammond (porn star)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable porn star. Fails WP:PORNBIO as he as never appeared in the centerfold of Playgirl, never won a notable award, or hasn't made a significant impact on the pornographic community. Tavix | Talk  02:16, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete his "assets," as they have not been immortalized quite enough, according to WP:PORNBIO . -- Oliver  Twisted (Talk) (Stuff) 05:18, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: I'm withdrawing my delete vote, after finding (and adding) some additional information and references. This guy seems to appear by name on just about every gay porn index, and is usually referred to as iconic. As porn bios go, this one seems to meet the spirit of the guidelines. -- Oliver  Twisted (Talk) (Stuff) 03:12, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete though it breaks my heart to see these beautiful (though unreferenced) buttocks removed from our environment. Drmies (talk) 17:45, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Change to keep given Oliver's, well, newfound knowledge and improvement of the article. Can we get a buttocks-picture added? I'm rather sad that that wonderfully frivolous sentence was struck from the article, even if it was unverified. Drmies (talk) 00:02, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Well known name, considered a legend or icon by many. Hits galore all over the internet. - &#10032; ALLST☆R &#10032; echo 18:53, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep but tag for Cleanup, Refimprove and add an image or two. Seems to meet WP:N, but needs a lot of work. Firestorm  Talk 05:23, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.