Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Harrison


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:03, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Jeff Harrison

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Appears to be non-notable. No third-party sources, google search does not reveal any coverage in reliable sources either. Pantherskin (talk) 08:27, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I googled 'Jeff Harrison poet', nothing much came back. He's a poet, its not difficult to call yourself a poet, persuading others is the hard part. Szzuk (talk) 21:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Ron Silliman has written about this poet.

http://ronsilliman.blogspot.com/2004/04/readers-of-this-blog-will-know-by-now.html

Andrew Gallix has mentioned him.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/booksblog/2008/jul/01/spampoetry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kazantsev (talk • contribs) 15:04, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Matthew D. Hoffman, Perry R. Cook, and David M. Blei of Princeton University have mentioned Jeff Harrison's poems in their paper "Data-Driven Recomposition Using The Hierarchical Dirichlet Process Hidden Markov Model".

http://soundlab.cs.princeton.edu/publications/hdphmm_icmc2008.pdf —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kazantsev (talk • contribs) 17:42, 6 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:56, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. BLP Subject lacks in-depth coverage. A few mentions of his work don't qualify him per WP:AUTHOR. Pcap ping  08:41, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The coverage provided doesn't seem to be enough to meet WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG. No prejudice to recreation if more coverage turns up. Alzarian16 (talk) 11:57, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Thanks, Starblueheather (talk) 16:35, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.