Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff K.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep AmiDaniel (Talk) 05:00, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Jeff K.
Fancruft. Non-notable fictional personality. RabinicLawyer 22:55, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable fancruft. incog 22:56, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, already covered on the SomethingAwful page. Minor characters of comedy websites do not deserve their own pages. Fan cruft. --TrollHistorian 23:15, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep notable internet memes. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 23:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Was very poplar in the past and is credited with helping popularize an early variation of l33t. Merge otherwise. --waffle iron talk 23:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fancruft --Curval 23:44, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable fictional personality. Notability is well asserted in the article.  This does not meet my definition of fancruft.  Stupid - well, yes.  Non-notable fancruft - no. Colon el  Tom 00:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep what the hell is up with one asshole suddenly deciding that every SA article needs to go? Kuralyov 00:29, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Something Awful. The El Reyko 00:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep probably just as notable as Something Awful itself. merging would be a mistake. --Liface 01:40, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per ...Col_tom :/ Danny Lilithborne 02:02, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Something Awful. A lot of SA-related AfDs have popped up lately, it's getting harder and harder to assume good faith. Flakeloaf 03:47, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Col_tom. Gail Wynand 03:58, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep at least as notable as B1FF if not more so - Tyler 04:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as notable Internet Meme.  However, article definitely needs to be cleaned and references added as appropriate and available.  --ElKevbo 04:16, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, per ElKevbo. RMG 04:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep - notable enough for an article, I'd warrant. --AlbertHerring 04:21, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Donkay ote 04:25, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Something Awful. MrKeith2317 04:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep quite possibly the most famous Something Awful theme. huge in the internet gaming community, well established meme &rArr;    SWAT Jester    Ready    Aim    Fire!  07:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Vashti 08:15, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - One of the more famous SA memes, I've seen it used outside the site many times. --Nosmo 14:48, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep RabinicLawyer hasn't been registered long and is deleting everything. --The_stuart 18:55, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per SWATJester, bad faith nom. Kuzaar 20:23, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as a formerly popular Internet phenomenon, although note that 1) the nominator isn't deleting anything, he's just putting stuff up for a vote, 2) maybe he's going through seeing things he doesn't like in large numbers. Assuming good faith is easy in this case. Lord Bob 21:17, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Not liking something isn't valid grounds for deletion, and even a cursory examination reveals that the "crazyfingers script kiddie" stereotype spread like wildfire across the Internet thanks to the presence of interrelated gaming communities. Kuzaar 13:47, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * By "not liking something", I was using a quick and easy term for "something which, in his opinion, violates one of the established Wikipedia criteria for deletion". Lord Bob 14:11, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep JeffK not notable?? His pastiche argot has become genuine slang... Mr Twain 11:56, 29 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.