Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Koch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Jeff Koch
It is written by a user of the same name, and appears strongly to be vanity. It claims notability, but this is not substantiated nor explicitly descrived.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 00:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. zzuuzz (talk) 00:46, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - vanity article, advertising, not even an article. -- Jay  (Reply)  01:01, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Ruby  01:03, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as non-notable, vanity, bollocks, etc.  dbtfz talk 04:03, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, but not speedy. If we start to speedy delete hoaxes, things will get out of hand. It's isn't nn-bio. Superm401 - Talk 04:22, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as vanity bio. ---J.Smith 06:46, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as vanity, nn. --Ter e nce Ong 09:12, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete., as per Jay.--Johnnyw 14:32, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO: a Google search doesn't seem to turn up anything related to this person. But the article doesn't satisfy WP:CSD. Since it claims over 100 awards, it does assert importance. bcasterlinetalk 18:58, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Userfy as vanity. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 05:06, 27 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.