Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Kurzon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 08:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Jeff Kurzon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:POLITICIAN, at present only a candidate for office. TheLongTone (talk) 17:49, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 2 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER.  Unscintillating (talk) 04:25, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Notability established by reliable press coverage, namely as a rootstriker activist. Being a no-lobbyist money candidate makes him apparently unique. Or maybe Merge to Rootstrikers though his notable points are not all linked to this movement --MikaBesac (talk) 20:30, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Sure, I probably should not have used the template politician since this person would rather fall in the category of activist (but had no template for this category). Holding office should only be only an indication for notability, which in this case was established with his well-known law school and Huffington Post class actions.--Valedictorii (talk) 00:40, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Some edition has been done to improve content and format from AfD version --LaFayettePolitico (talk) 00:25, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Numerous independent sources meet the WP:GNG. Was it Tocqueville who said the most dangerous types of activists were attorneys?--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:55, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.