Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Latas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Jeff Latas

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Failed local politician, never elected to office fails WP:POLITICIAN. Military experience fails WP:BIO as I understand it. His service medals aren't significant enough to satisfy Notability requirement (i.e. Meritorious Service Medals are lower than even a purple heart). Toddst1 (talk) 18:17, 21 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: I strongly suspect that this article is an old case of conflict of interest. The creator of the article has a suspicious username and just came back to create the speedily deleted Salette latas.  In any case, the subject of this article doesn't meet notability criteria, as the nominator has pointed out.  Agree fully.   Maedin \talk 18:27, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 22 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: As per conflict of interest, of which this is clearly an example. Agree with previous voters entirely. Artifactblue (talk) 01:57, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:22, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:22, 24 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. I have always argued that serious candidates for U.S. Senate or Congress who get half or more of the winner's vote should be considered notable. This guy, however, finished third in the primary with only six percent, when the top two got a combined 85%.  Kestenbaum (talk) 16:30, 24 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.