Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Mach (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Jeff Mach
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. There is a lack of coverage about Mach in independent reliable sources. Whilst this article does have many sources there is not enough about him as opposed to coverage of events he had involvment in. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Oppose - This concern was raised and addressed in the last deletion suggestion. The subject is notable, the events are a primary reason for the notability.Holzman-Tweed (talk) 13:50, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:57, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:57, 25 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete at best and draft & userfy later if needed as my searches found nothing further convincing and the current article is still questionable for the applicable notability.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Articles are typically either draftified or userfied, but not both. North America1000 10:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm quite aware of that, I simply mention both as either are applicable. SwisterTwister   talk  14:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:27, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment, subject does not appear to meet WP:BIO or WP:ANYBIO as there he doesn't appear to be have significant coverage. However, the events that he is involved with may relate to no. 3 of WP:CREATIVE ie. "3.The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work.  In addition, such work must have been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." Coolabahapple (talk) 07:29, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.