Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Pliskin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 10:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Jeff Pliskin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A possible autobiography of a non notable photographer & music video director who falls short of GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Celestina007 (talk) 09:55, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 09:55, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 09:55, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 09:55, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 09:55, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 09:55, 6 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG -there are no independent sources. Jmertel23 (talk) 13:43, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - After searching, I did not find any SIGCOV in independent reliable sources. Does not meet GNG or NARTIST at this time. Netherzone (talk) 19:38, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete – Regrettably I don't think there are reliable independent sources to indicate significant notability. A search found no coverage in any newspapers, for example.
 * A couple of hours after the article was created, I placed a "multiple issues" tag at the top of the article, due to concerns I had over the notability of the subject, not enough citations and the author of the article seemingly having a close connection with the subject. The "multiple issues" tag was subsequently removed by the author without the issues really being addressed. A few citations were provided by the author, but not enough good sources to demonstrate sufficient notability and not enough to warrant the "multiple issues" tag being removed. So unfortunately I think the article should be deleted. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 01:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Where do I begin? Besides the chatty, essay-like stream of consciousness tone, there are literally no newspaper articles or similar sources we could use to fix this mess. Bearian (talk) 22:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - 1. the article is not notable enough for Wikipedia (fails A7) and/or 2. the article appears to be heavily promotional (fails G11). Comment added on 9 January by


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.