Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Reine-Adelaïde


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:05, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Jeff Reine-Adelaïde

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Declined speedy. However, player fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league, only non-notable pre-season friendly competitions. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 08:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Fenix down (talk) 08:22, 27 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL JMHamo (talk) 10:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – No evidence of notability. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Qed237&#160;(talk) 11:42, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – Some friendly games and being praised by Arsene Wenger are all very well but they don't make you notable. If he's as good as he is painted his time will come - but not yet.--Egghead06 (talk) 15:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 17:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:42, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:42, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:42, 28 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:56, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete- Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. NextGenSam619t@lk 04:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - He was part of the French squad (Under-17) which won the finals of 2015 UEFA European Under-17 Championship in Bulgaria. --34 super héros (talk) 12:31, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:NFOOTBALL explicitly excludes youth football as source of notability: Youth players are not notable unless they satisfy one of the statements above, or if they can be shown to meet the wider requirements of WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Some reliable sources (WP:GNG) : - Lens : Reine-Adelaide graine de star (Mercato 365).- Arsenal's 17-year-old wonderkid Jeff Reine-Adelaide ready for his big break (Telegraph). - Theo Walcott backs 'very talented' Jeff Reine-Adelaide for Arsenal success (ESPN FC). - Jeff Reine-Adelaide is at the best club to develop his ability, insists Arsenal’s Theo Walcott (Metro). - Profile (Soccerway). --34 super héros (talk) 10:56, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Some comments on the sources provided
 * Lens : Reine-Adelaide graine de star - Not significant coverage, literally one paragraph on the player.
 * Arsenal's 17-year-old wonderkid Jeff Reine-Adelaide ready for his big break - Actually a lengthy article on the player. IMO not enough on its own, but if more could be found like this...
 * Jeff Reine-Adelaide is at the best club to develop his ability, insists Arsenal’s Theo Walcott - An article that is essentially repeated quotes from one player at a club noting the promise of a colleague is hardly reliable sourcing, he's not going to the press and say that the new kid they signed is rubbish!
 * Theo Walcott backs 'very talented' Jeff Reine-Adelaide for Arsenal success - Same as the previous comment.
 * Profile - Soccerway profile means nothing in itself, only confirms he does not meet WP:NFOOTY. Fenix down (talk) 11:08, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.