Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Ruge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy deleted per G4 and A7. Konstable 06:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Jeff Ruge
This former A7 speedy article fails WP:BIO. I'm taking this to AfD due to its recreation. The 6 search results for the subject's name have nothing to do with the subject matter of the article. Erechtheus 00:55, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per CSD A7 CSD G4. Recreation of previously speedily deleted article. --TBC TaLk?!? 01:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as above. Almost certainly a hoax, there's enough coverage of surfing and skating online that any pro would manage at least a google hit or two.  Posting a hoax article once is bad enough, doing so repeatedly is tantamount to vandalism. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  01:04, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete agree with users above. --BLuToRsE 01:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. G4 does not apply when there hasn't been an XfD. That's why I went this way. This is the path to being able to use G4 and eventually protection if this guy recreates the article. Erechtheus 01:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Sorry, my mistake. Either way, the article still falls under CSD A7, which it was previously deleted as.--TBC TaLk?!? 01:24, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. On further evaluation, it seems that the type of protection I'm talking about does not require an AfD. It's something an admin can roll on at his discretion. I don't know about you, but I learn a little bit about policy every day. Erechtheus 02:14, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * CSD doesn't count as XfD? I'm skeptical -- I think it counts. - CheNuevara 02:48, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment"This clause does not apply if the only prior deletions were speedy or proposed deletions" Erechtheus 02:51, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Also note that "although in this case, the previous speedy criterion, or other speedy deletion criteria, may apply". Thus even if G4 doesn't apply, CSD A7 still does.--TBC TaLk?!? 02:56, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Exactly. Erechtheus 02:59, 20 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.