Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Weiss


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. X clamation point  00:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Jeff Weiss

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Possible hoax, didn't want to CSD and be wrong. T-95 (talk) 15:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep- Legitimate actor. I added a couple of refs to support.  There are many more out there if needed.  ttonyb1 (talk) 16:10, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak keep not a hoax, but the article is short, poorly written, and makes some strange claims, such as winning an Obie award in 1959, which according to the NYTimes article was just a year after he dropped out of high school. Possible?  I guess.  Likely?  Not really.  No objection to deletion if the article isn't substantially improved in the next month or so. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Neutral. The article needs a complete rewrite if it is to be kept. However, I do see that a playwright named Jeff Weiss won an Obie, but in 1980, for a play called That's How the Rent Gets Paid. Assuming this is the same person, the article should be kept if it is rewritten and sourced. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article has not been improved sufficiently yet to warrant keeping it. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:47, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, notability highly questionable, but the NYT reference is a WP:RS that's high-profile leads me to expect a marginal pass of WP:NOBJ. Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk ) 20:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Great work by ttonyb1 make the notability obvious. At least one entire New York Times article was written about the guy. The article's a stub now, and the tiny bit that is there might be wrong...or it might not be. But it doesn't seem to be a hoax. Flying Jazz (talk) 23:30, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.